翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ American comic book
・ American comic book tropes
・ American comics
・ American Comics Group
・ American Commerce Center
・ American Commission to Negotiate Peace
・ American Committee for Cultural Freedom
・ American Committee for Devastated France
・ American Committee for Peace in Chechnya
・ American Committee for Relief in Ireland
・ American Committee for Spanish Freedom
・ American Committee for the Defense of Leon Trotsky
・ American Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia
・ American Committee on United Europe
・ American Common Sense Party
American Communications Ass'n v. Douds
・ American Communist History
・ American Community Gardening Association
・ American Community School
・ American Community School at Beirut
・ American Community School in Amman
・ American Community School in Saigon
・ American Community School of Abu Dhabi
・ American Community School Sharjah
・ American Community Schools
・ American Community Survey
・ American Comparative Literature Association
・ American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act
・ American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act
・ American Competitiveness Initiative


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

American Communications Ass'n v. Douds : ウィキペディア英語版
American Communications Ass'n v. Douds

''American Communications Association v. Douds'', , is a 5-to-1 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Taft–Hartley Act's imposition of an anti-communist oath on labor union leaders does not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is not an ''ex post facto'' law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, and is not a "test oath" in violation of Article Six of the Constitution.
==Background==
The American Communications Association (ACA) was founded in 1931 as the American Radio Telegraphists Association (ARTA) by Mervyn Rathbone.〔Lowitt, ''Interpreting Twentieth-Century America: A Reader,'' 1973, p. 452.〕〔The ARTA should not be confused with the United Radio Telegraphists Association, a similar union in the U.S. founded in 1917 but which had disbanded by 1922. See: May-Stewart, ''Handbook of American Trade-Unions: 1936 Edition,'' 1936, p. 278.〕 The union represented telegraphists and radio operators (on land and at sea) in the United States. The union had previously been involved in a Supreme Court case regarding the use of strikebreakers in strikes (''NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.'', 304 U.S. 333 (1938)), which it had lost. In 1937, the union changed its name to the American Communications Association and affiliated with the newly formed Congress of Industrial Organizations.〔Downey, "Telegraph Messenger Strikes and Their Impact on Telegraph Unionization," in ''The Encyclopedia of Strikes in American History,'' 2009, p. 516.〕 A majority of the union's members were strongly left-wing, and most the union's leaders were members of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA)—with the union effectively under the control of the CPUSA.〔Stark, "Some Unions Will Sign Anti-Communist Papers," ''New York Times,'' August 31, 1947; Busky, ''Communism in History and Theory: Asia, Africa, and the Americas,'' 2002, p. 155; Starobin, ''American Communism in Crisis, 1943-1957,'' 1975, p. 143; Rabinowitz, ''Unrepentant Leftist: A Lawyer's Memoir,'' 1996, p. 31.〕
The United States Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) on June 27, 1935, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed it into law on July 5.〔"Both Houses Clear Wagner Labor Bill," ''New York Times'', June 28, 1935; "Roosevelt Signs the Wagner Bill as 'Just to Labor'," ''New York Times,'' July 6, 1935.〕 In 1947, Congress amended the NLRA by enacting the Labor–Management Relations Act (better known as the Taft-Hartley Act) on June 23, 1947, overriding President Harry S. Truman's veto.〔Stark, "Industry, Labor Sharply Divided," ''New York Times,'' June 21, 1947; White, "Truman Plea Fails," ''New York Times,'' June 24, 1947.〕 Section 9(h) of the Taft-Hartley Act required leaders of labor unions to file an affidavit with the National Labor Relations Board affirming that they were not members of the Communist Party USA and did not advocate the violent overthrow of the United States federal government.〔Abernathy and Perry, ''Civil Liberties Under the Constitution,'' 1993, p. 260.〕 If a union had an elected leader who did not file such an affidavit, that union would lose the protection of the NLRA.〔
ACA leaders categorically refused to sign the anti-communist affidavits on the grounds that the oaths violated their First Amendment rights. On October 29, 1947, Charles T. Douds, regional director of the National Labor Relations Board in New York, barred the American Communications Association from appearing on an NLRB-supervised union organizing election (its very first action under the new Taft-Hartley anti-communist oath provisions).〔Stark, "NLRB Blocks Union Bargaining Right," ''New York Times,'' October 30, 1947.〕〔"High Court Will Rule on Two Cases Involving Taft Act Oath and Eisler," ''New York Times,'' November 9, 1948.〕 The ACA sued to have the provision declared unconstitutional as a violation of its leaders' First Amendment rights.〔Loftus, "High Court Delays Red Clause Ruling," ''New York Times,'' January 14, 1949.〕
On June 29, 1948, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held, in a 2-to-1 decision written by Judge Thomas Walter Swan, that Section 9(h) did not impermissibly impose on union members' First Amendment rights.〔"Final Court Test on Taft Bill Seen," ''New York Times,'' June 30, 1948.〕 Attorney Victor Rabinowitz appealed the case to the Supreme Court.〔 The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 8, 1949.〔 Although the Court was due to hear oral argument on January 13, 1949, it delayed this in order to take on another case (''United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board'') with almost identical issues.〔 Argument was rescheduled for February 28, 1949,〔 but did not occur until October 11 so that both cases could be heard together.
Three of the Court's most liberal justices did not participate in the decision.〔Rabinowitz, ''Unrepentant Leftist: A Lawyer's Memoir,'' 1996, p. 54.〕〔Wiecek, ''History of the Supreme Court of the United States...,'' 2006, p. 547.〕 Justice William O. Douglas did not participate because he had nearly been killed in a horseback-riding accident earlier in the year, and was still convalescing at his home in Arizona.〔Christopher, ''Chances of a Lifetime: A Memoir,'' 2001, p. 20; Douglas, ''The Court Years, 1939-1975: The Autobiography of William O. Douglas,'' 1981, p. 95.〕 Associate Justice Tom Clark had been President Truman's Attorney General, and had overseen the prosecution of the ACA.〔Frankel, ''History in Dispute: The Red Scare After 1945,'' 2000, p. 151; Wiecek, ''History of the Supreme Court of the United States...'', 2006, p. 546.〕 Although he joined the Court on August 24, 1949,〔"Truman Sees Clark Sworn In By Vinson at the White House," ''New York Times,'' August 25, 1949.〕 Clark had recused himself to his prior involvement in the case. Associate Justice Wiley Blount Rutledge, a staunch liberal and strong advocate for civil rights,〔Newman, ''The Yale Biographical Dictionary of American Law,'' 2009, p. 473.〕 had died unexpectedly of a stroke on September 10, 1949, at the age of 55.〔"Justice Wiley Rutledge Dies of Brain Hemorrhage at 55," ''New York Times,'' September 11, 1949.〕 His successor, 59-year-old Sherman Minton, a former Democratic Senator from Indiana and a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, was nominated as his replacement on September 16, 1949, but was not sworn in until October 12.〔Wood, "Minton Named to High Court," ''New York Times,'' September 16, 1949; "Minton Is Confirmed For Court, 48 to 16," ''Associated Press,'' October 5, 1949; "Minton Sworn In As Supreme Court Justice," ''New York Times,'' October 13, 1949.〕 His arrival on the Court came two days after oral argument, and he was not able to participate in the decision.〔As it turned out, Minton was one of the Court's more conservative members. See: Eisler, ''The Last Liberal: Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., and the Decisions That Transformed America,'' 1993, p. 76.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「American Communications Ass'n v. Douds」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.